Scenario: In a tech startup, partners Aria Montgomery and Jake Donovan have a disagreement over integrating artificial intelligence into their product. Aria believes that the integration would be beneficial for business growth, while Jake feels that the new functionality would divert resources away from their core business. Recently, Aria received a letter from Jake’s counsel, Mr. Leonard Harwood, claiming that the partnership agreement grants Jake the final say in technological decisions. You are Aria Montgomery’s lawyer.
Instructions: Draft a 200-300 word formal response to Mr. Leonard Harwood’s letter claiming that the partnership agreement grants Jake the final say in this matter.
Content guidelines: Begin by professionally acknowledging Mr. Harwood’s letter. Address the terms laid out in the partnership agreement and cite specific clauses that contradict Mr. Harwood’s claim. Suggest mediation as a way to find common ground, and highlight the importance of collaborative decision-making in the partnership. Conclude the letter by proposing a timeframe for continued dialogue or action from Mr. Harwood and Jake Donovan.